I’m baaaaack! Yeah, I know I missed last week’s post. Mea culpa and all that jazz, right? ; P
The past couple of weeks were very taxing for me, and I just couldn’t summon up enough intestinal fortitude to come up with a post for last week. The wonky weather that rolled through the area wreaked havoc on my head, so I pretty much felt crappy for several days – even missed a day of work because of it. Needless to say, I didn’t much feel like exercising, either. And since my unwavering exercise routine seems to be the catalyst for my progress so far, I must admit I only lost a couple of pounds the past two weeks. I’m not gonna let it get me down, though. I’m still ahead of my goal to lose two pounds per week, I’m feeling better, and I’m back in the groove! And to make up for not posting last week, I’m giving you this week’s post a day early. : )
In a totally unrelated, but nonetheless button-popping, subject, Baby Gavin won first place in his division at a local baby show this past week! He slept right through it (hey, he’s only three weeks old) but still managed to charm the pants off of the judges. Here he is, showing off his ribbon, totally tuckered from all of the excitement!
My biggest dieting dilemma at the moment is scales. Not the kind you find on fish – I’m talking about the ones that unassumingly occupy a corner of the bathroom floor, then spin the dial all willy-nilly when you step on them and refuse to give you the same reading twice in a row. Whatever evil virus causes scales to do this, ours has certainly succumbed to it. Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me to find out the little bugger has been lying to me all this time and I’ve really only lost five pounds so far.
Our bathroom scale is what I consider to be a reputable brand, but it is several years old and has the dial-type readout. These types can be hard to read, since the hash marks for each pound are pretty close together. I have trouble reading them sometimes, even with four eyes. Hmmm…maybe it’s time for an upgrade.
Another question I have is why do the doctors’ scales seem to weigh you so much heavier than your scales at home? Are they that much more accurate, or do doctors just calibrate theirs to add to your weight so it gives them one more thing to bitch about to you?
Once again, I took off on the Information Superhighway to see if I could find answers to this week’s questions. (I swear, if I were to ever permanently lose internet access I think I would wither and die!) Here’s what I found out: when choosing bathroom scales, do a little legwork and find a reputable brand with a good rating for accuracy. Turns out pricing scales is pretty much like pricing cars – the models and cost are widely varied. With a little research, you won't have to pay a fortune for decent bathroom scales. I ordered a set of digital scales online, found them on sale and paid around $30 with free shipping. I read 15 consumer reviews and overall they rated them about 4.5 out of 5 stars. I’m still waiting for them to arrive, so we shall see how they perform. Wonder how they compare to the ones we currently have? : /
As for doctor scales, I found so many variables it’s almost impossible to compare them to your bathroom scales at home. Firstly, most people weigh themselves at home with minimal (or no) clothing. I suppose you could do this at the doctor’s office as well, as long as you don’t mind getting the stink eye from other patients who may pass by during your weigh-in. But for the sake of argument (and public decency) we’ll assume everyone is fully clothed. Now, let’s define fully clothed. Do you have on a sweatshirt, jeans, and boots? Or are you in shorts, a t-shirt, and flip-flops? Are you like my husband and carry around five pounds of stuff (literally) in your pants pockets? See where I’m going with this? You can easily add 2-3 pounds (or more) to your measurement just by what you’re wearing.
I also learned the time of day can make a difference, too. Your weight can fluctuate as much as 2-3 pounds during the course of the day, what with eating, drinking, activity, etc. From what I read, you’ll get the most accurate reading first thing in the morning, before daily life has a chance to factor in. So, if you add everything up, it appears you should weigh yourself first thing in the morning, with no clothing. Seems to me the easiest way to accomplish this would be to weigh yourself at home. Even if your scales are off by a couple of pounds, by consistently weighing on the same scale you can still accurately track your weight loss. Unless you’re like me and can’t read your scales.
If, however, you don’t feel complete without tracking your weight on doctor scales, you can either a) buy your own set for home, or b) talk your doctor into giving you a key to the office so you can sneak in before hours for your “true nekkid doctor scale weight.” Choices, choices.
Middle age is when your age starts to show around your middle. -- Bob Hope
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Week Five Results: The Starvation Scare
Since I began my quest five weeks ago, I have used the tools at myfitnesspal.com to help me track my calorie intake and my exercise. After eating three meals per day, along with a couple of snacks, my average intake is around 800 calories per day. My body burns about 1450 calories per day now (before exercise); a 3500 calorie deficit is needed to lose one pound of weight. OK, now let’s do the math:
Weekly calorie needs (1450 X 7) = 10,150
Weekly calorie intake (800 x 7) = 5600
Calories burned during exercise (350 X 7) = 2450
Weekly calorie deficit = 7000
A 7000 weekly calorie deficit means I’m on track to lose approximately two pounds per week. Sounds reasonable, right? Well, not according to myfitnesspal’s calculations. After entering my food consumption at the end of the day, I get a not-so-subtle warning that I’m eating too few calories per day and am in danger of going into “starvation mode,” which is essentially a drastic decrease in the body’s metabolic rate in response to prolonged calorie reduction. This results in a significant slow down or cessation in weight loss. Since I have been steadily losing three pounds per week, I really didn’t pay much attention to this caution.
Until this week.
When I stepped on the scales on Wednesday, I was horrified to learn I had lost only one pound. One single, solitary pound...IN A WHOLE WEEK! The dieting euphoria I had been living in for the past month suddenly vanished, and I had agonizing visions of being stuck in fat mode for forever. I just knew my body had shifted into the dreaded “starvation mode” and I would never lose another pound. Ever. No matter how little I ate or how much I exercised. The sudden funk was almost palpable.
OK, so maybe it was time to read up on this so-called starvation mode phenomenon.
After more internet surfing (who knew this skill would be so handy on a diet?) I found nearly as many articles on starvation mode as I did on the fat/muscle burning issue. Swell. It’s no wonder obesity runs rampant in our country, what with the preponderance of fast food in our diets and the scientific know-how required to understand and put together a decent weight loss program. What I did learn was that, while there really is such a thing as starvation mode, most studies found it happens when calories are reduced to less than half of what the body requires. And it’s only after the body is in starvation mode for an extended period that there is a significant decrease in metabolic rate.
Whew! I feel a little better after that! If you want to read more on the subject, CLICK HERE for Google’s list of articles. And I know I shouldn’t panic over this week’s results. I’m still above my goal of losing two pounds per week. I just have to keep on track and see what next week brings.
Lastly, I did realize one other important thing this week: the more weight I lose, the more adjustments I need to make to my calorie intake and exercise regimen. The less you weigh, the fewer calories your body needs. So I’m going to have to either eat less or exercise more – or both. Booyah. I sure hope that dieting euphoria comes back real soon.
This week’s funny is actually a true story. Years ago, I had a neighbor with a big mouth and an even bigger belly. Harsh, I know, but nonetheless true. I was pretty good sized myself at the time, but he actually had the gall to say I was fat. Which really pissed me off. What do you say to something like that, right? Here’s what I told him: “Yeah, I may be fat, but you’re just damned ugly. And I can diet.” That was the last comment he made about my weight...to my face, anyway.
Weekly calorie needs (1450 X 7) = 10,150
Weekly calorie intake (800 x 7) = 5600
Calories burned during exercise (350 X 7) = 2450
Weekly calorie deficit = 7000
A 7000 weekly calorie deficit means I’m on track to lose approximately two pounds per week. Sounds reasonable, right? Well, not according to myfitnesspal’s calculations. After entering my food consumption at the end of the day, I get a not-so-subtle warning that I’m eating too few calories per day and am in danger of going into “starvation mode,” which is essentially a drastic decrease in the body’s metabolic rate in response to prolonged calorie reduction. This results in a significant slow down or cessation in weight loss. Since I have been steadily losing three pounds per week, I really didn’t pay much attention to this caution.
Until this week.
When I stepped on the scales on Wednesday, I was horrified to learn I had lost only one pound. One single, solitary pound...IN A WHOLE WEEK! The dieting euphoria I had been living in for the past month suddenly vanished, and I had agonizing visions of being stuck in fat mode for forever. I just knew my body had shifted into the dreaded “starvation mode” and I would never lose another pound. Ever. No matter how little I ate or how much I exercised. The sudden funk was almost palpable.
OK, so maybe it was time to read up on this so-called starvation mode phenomenon.
After more internet surfing (who knew this skill would be so handy on a diet?) I found nearly as many articles on starvation mode as I did on the fat/muscle burning issue. Swell. It’s no wonder obesity runs rampant in our country, what with the preponderance of fast food in our diets and the scientific know-how required to understand and put together a decent weight loss program. What I did learn was that, while there really is such a thing as starvation mode, most studies found it happens when calories are reduced to less than half of what the body requires. And it’s only after the body is in starvation mode for an extended period that there is a significant decrease in metabolic rate.
Whew! I feel a little better after that! If you want to read more on the subject, CLICK HERE for Google’s list of articles. And I know I shouldn’t panic over this week’s results. I’m still above my goal of losing two pounds per week. I just have to keep on track and see what next week brings.
Lastly, I did realize one other important thing this week: the more weight I lose, the more adjustments I need to make to my calorie intake and exercise regimen. The less you weigh, the fewer calories your body needs. So I’m going to have to either eat less or exercise more – or both. Booyah. I sure hope that dieting euphoria comes back real soon.
This week’s funny is actually a true story. Years ago, I had a neighbor with a big mouth and an even bigger belly. Harsh, I know, but nonetheless true. I was pretty good sized myself at the time, but he actually had the gall to say I was fat. Which really pissed me off. What do you say to something like that, right? Here’s what I told him: “Yeah, I may be fat, but you’re just damned ugly. And I can diet.” That was the last comment he made about my weight...to my face, anyway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)